Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Articles"

From RogueBasin
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Category getting too big)
 
m
Line 4: Line 4:


I suggest that we keep the roguelike development articles here, but move the unrelated articles to other categories (perhaps Category:Concepts or Category:Gameplay). It would be best to move move the development articles to a new category like Category:Development, but there are over 150 articles that should be there, so unless there is an automated tool to do that, it probably isn't worth the effort. [[User:Nate879|Nathan Stoddard]] 01:27, 22 March 2009 (CET)
I suggest that we keep the roguelike development articles here, but move the unrelated articles to other categories (perhaps Category:Concepts or Category:Gameplay). It would be best to move move the development articles to a new category like Category:Development, but there are over 150 articles that should be there, so unless there is an automated tool to do that, it probably isn't worth the effort. [[User:Nate879|Nathan Stoddard]] 01:27, 22 March 2009 (CET)
: "I don't think that it should have articles like "trousers" or "rat"." Agreed.  I'm not sure articles like "trousers" or "rat" should actually be (separate) articles.  I was just trying to work down the "uncategorized pages" list as best I could.[[User:PaulBlay|PaulBlay]]

Revision as of 01:44, 22 March 2009

Category getting too big

This category should probably be split into several categories. It has too many different types of articles. It was probably intended to have articles about designing and making roguelikes, and most of the articles in this category are related to that. I don't think that it should have articles like "trousers" or "rat".

I suggest that we keep the roguelike development articles here, but move the unrelated articles to other categories (perhaps Category:Concepts or Category:Gameplay). It would be best to move move the development articles to a new category like Category:Development, but there are over 150 articles that should be there, so unless there is an automated tool to do that, it probably isn't worth the effort. Nathan Stoddard 01:27, 22 March 2009 (CET)

"I don't think that it should have articles like "trousers" or "rat"." Agreed. I'm not sure articles like "trousers" or "rat" should actually be (separate) articles. I was just trying to work down the "uncategorized pages" list as best I could.PaulBlay