View source for RogueBasin talk:Community Portal

{{talkpagetool}}

<table class="infobox" style="float:right;clear:right; width: 11em; border: 1px solid #93BACB; background:#E0E7EF;font-size:95%; margin:1em; line-height:1.4em;">
<tr>
<th style="background:#C2D8EF; padding:.4em; margin:1em; font-size:105%/j">Archives</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
* [[/Archive 1|1]]
* [[/Archive 2|2]]
</td>
</tr>
</table>

==Feedback wanted on article blanking==
I'm an admin here, and mostly what I do is remove spam posts. We don't have any mechanisms here to deal with disputes on article content, so I'm opening this discussion on what to do about a new user who has blanked several articles because they are asserted to be of low quality.

[[User:MisterMentat]] has blanked [[2D Room system architecture]], [[Gunshot Coding]] and [[System Architecture, the strategy to complex implementations]], with an edit summary for the last two of "The article is not well written, and it seems like it's bad spam text generated from a neural network." All three articles have the same original author, [[User:Youngblood]]. I agree that the articles are not of very good quality, but I don't think they are spam or generated from a neural network, and I think they have potential to improve. What do other editors here think? You can see the articles prior to blanking using the "History" tab.

MisterMentat also removed an external link to www.kathekonta.com/rlguide/index.html from [[Articles]], saying "The link is dead, and it points to very suspects sites". I tried the link; it requested that I install Flash, and that might or might not be suspicious, but I chose not to proceed further. Note that I have not made the link clickable here. I'm not inclined to restore this link myself.

I'll notify MisterMentat and Youngblood about this post.-[[User:Muscles|Muscles]] ([[User talk:Muscles|talk]]) 05:53, 28 September 2019 (CEST)