Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evolution"

From RogueBasin
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (verifiability)
Line 2: Line 2:


: This is not wikipedia. If you are not able to confirm something it is not good enough reason to delete informaion. There is no offical site currently. <b><i>[[User:Ancient|–Michal Bielinski]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ancient|Talk]]</sup></i></b> 23:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
: This is not wikipedia. If you are not able to confirm something it is not good enough reason to delete informaion. There is no offical site currently. <b><i>[[User:Ancient|–Michal Bielinski]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ancient|Talk]]</sup></i></b> 23:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
: I actually agree with paulblay here, a release is not just any old content, it specifically states that this game was released SOMEWHERE. And if it wasn't, I think the offending "release date" should be removed. There's been a glut of these talkie talkie pages recently. I don't mind them, but it's going too far if they claim to have fake releases.

Revision as of 00:24, 27 August 2009

Did this really have a release on 2006 Jul 04 ? No official site I could find. PaulBlay

This is not wikipedia. If you are not able to confirm something it is not good enough reason to delete informaion. There is no offical site currently. –Michal BielinskiTalk 23:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I actually agree with paulblay here, a release is not just any old content, it specifically states that this game was released SOMEWHERE. And if it wasn't, I think the offending "release date" should be removed. There's been a glut of these talkie talkie pages recently. I don't mind them, but it's going too far if they claim to have fake releases.