Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stable games old"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Hell, yeah. DoomRL is stable!) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I've been playing DoomRL quite a bit those days and I would, personnally, state that it's stable! :) — [[User:Poulpy|Poulpy]] 21:11, 25 May 2005 (CEST) | :I've been playing DoomRL quite a bit those days and I would, personnally, state that it's stable! :) — [[User:Poulpy|Poulpy]] 21:11, 25 May 2005 (CEST) | ||
Move it then ;-) I would do that myself, but I have no Wiki managing skills :-/ --[[User:Kisielewicz|Kisielewicz]] 21:51, 25 May 2005 (CEST) | |||
:Done. :-) — [[User:Poulpy|Poulpy]] 23:40, 25 May 2005 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:40, 25 May 2005
I guess that considering the new definition of stable games, then DoomRL should be considered Stable?
- I've been playing DoomRL quite a bit those days and I would, personnally, state that it's stable! :) — Poulpy 21:11, 25 May 2005 (CEST)
Move it then ;-) I would do that myself, but I have no Wiki managing skills :-/ --Kisielewicz 21:51, 25 May 2005 (CEST)
- Done. :-) — Poulpy 23:40, 25 May 2005 (CEST)