Difference between revisions of "Talk:DND"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I consider myself corrected, but the [http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.games.roguelike.development/browse_frm/thread/e67770fbf41bf2ec/e59b9dd2367e4805?#e59b9dd2367e4805 RGRD thread] is mostly a heated debate/Flamewar about creativity in roguelikes (Not that that wouldn't make an interesting article...), even the (one and only) website is clear as mud. | I consider myself corrected, but the [http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.games.roguelike.development/browse_frm/thread/e67770fbf41bf2ec/e59b9dd2367e4805?#e59b9dd2367e4805 RGRD thread] is mostly a heated debate/Flamewar about creativity in roguelikes (Not that that wouldn't make an interesting article...), even the (one and only) website is clear as mud. | ||
I'm reduced to reading the sourcecode to gain any understanding, and I swore I'd never read BASIC again... (And I'm pretty rusty)--[[User:DMB|D.M.B.]] 03:28, 28 Mar 2006 (CEST) | I'm reduced to reading the sourcecode to gain any understanding, and I swore I'd never read BASIC again... (And I'm pretty rusty)--[[User:DMB|D.M.B.]] 03:28, 28 Mar 2006 (CEST) | ||
Is this DnD or DND ? The title and the use in the article differ.[[User:PaulBlay|PaulBlay]] | |||
Revision as of 14:02, 23 March 2009
I consider myself corrected, but the RGRD thread is mostly a heated debate/Flamewar about creativity in roguelikes (Not that that wouldn't make an interesting article...), even the (one and only) website is clear as mud. I'm reduced to reading the sourcecode to gain any understanding, and I swore I'd never read BASIC again... (And I'm pretty rusty)--D.M.B. 03:28, 28 Mar 2006 (CEST)
Is this DnD or DND ? The title and the use in the article differ.PaulBlay