Difference between revisions of "Talk:Combat"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
With all articles removed from the Combat category, that reference is out of date, but without that link, this entry really says nothing. "Combat" is too broad a concept to really deal with except through a category, so my instinct is to delete this page. What do you think? [[User:Rdanhenry|Rdanhenry]] 08:28, 14 June 2009 (CEST) | With all articles removed from the Combat category, that reference is out of date, but without that link, this entry really says nothing. "Combat" is too broad a concept to really deal with except through a category, so my instinct is to delete this page. What do you think? [[User:Rdanhenry|Rdanhenry]] 08:28, 14 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
: Don't forget to check the "What links here" page first. [[User:PaulBlay|PaulBlay]] | : Don't forget to check the "What links here" page first. Really though I don't know why "Combat" isn't a valid subcategory of Articles. The Articles category is too crowded already, IMO. [[User:PaulBlay|PaulBlay]] |
Revision as of 09:47, 14 June 2009
With all articles removed from the Combat category, that reference is out of date, but without that link, this entry really says nothing. "Combat" is too broad a concept to really deal with except through a category, so my instinct is to delete this page. What do you think? Rdanhenry 08:28, 14 June 2009 (CEST)
- Don't forget to check the "What links here" page first. Really though I don't know why "Combat" isn't a valid subcategory of Articles. The Articles category is too crowded already, IMO. PaulBlay