Difference between revisions of "Aspects of playing"
Kisielewicz (talk | contribs) m |
m |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= Four aspects of playing a computer game = | = Four aspects of playing a computer game = | ||
There are four things we look for in the games we play. Every | |||
game will give us a mix of those four, a mix of unequal proportions. | |||
game will give us a mix of those | |||
== Play as in playing chess or poker == | == Play as in playing chess or poker == | ||
The computer game may be viewed as 'game' in | The computer game may be viewed as 'game' in its common sense, with its | ||
strict rules, a board, tokens, etc. Sometimes it will require thinking, | strict rules, a board, tokens, etc. Sometimes it will require thinking, | ||
sometimes just luck (and sometimes good reflexes), but those can be very | sometimes just luck (and sometimes good reflexes), but those can be very | ||
abstract. It's important to remember that every computer game is a game first. | abstract. It's important to remember that every computer game is a game first. | ||
In order to play such a game, first of all you have to know and comprehend | In order to play such a game, first of all you have to know and comprehend | ||
its rules. There may be hidden information or gambling, but still the player | |||
should have enough information to make decisions. The overall looks of the | should have enough information to make decisions. The overall looks of the | ||
game isn't really important, as long as it's not interfering with the players | game isn't really important, as long as it's not interfering with the players | ||
Line 33: | Line 28: | ||
kid's dolls -- they are not realistic, even Barbie isn't. The important parts | kid's dolls -- they are not realistic, even Barbie isn't. The important parts | ||
are exaggerated, everything else is left for user's imagination. | are exaggerated, everything else is left for user's imagination. | ||
The books tend to be more immersive than movies -- remember that. | The books tend to be more immersive than movies -- it's important to remember that. | ||
== Play as in watching a play == | == Play as in watching a play == | ||
Ok, this metaphor is a little stretched. It should be rather like watching | Ok, this metaphor is a little stretched. It should be rather like watching | ||
a movie. Yes, there's still some immersion, | a movie. Yes, there's still some immersion, one might even make several | ||
decisions, but what | decisions, but what one is most concerned about is just watching. One may watch | ||
because what | because what he sees is beautifully drawn, nicely animated, perfectly | ||
calculated, but | calculated, but one might also watch because the story is entertaining, the | ||
characters are cute, the narration is atmospheric or | characters are cute, the narration is atmospheric or one just wants to know | ||
what will happen next. | what will happen next. | ||
Modern games go mostly in this direction, but there's not much place | |||
for it in a roguelike game. Yes, | for it in a roguelike game. Yes, one can explore nicely-generated dungeon, be | ||
interested when | interested when he finds certain item for the first time, feel emotions when | ||
he completes certain quest for the first time. But that's it. | |||
== Play as in playing sports == | == Play as in playing sports == | ||
A competition. The simple satisfaction of winning, or the more complicated | A competition. The simple satisfaction of winning, or the more complicated | ||
triumph of being better than | triumph of being better than one's friends. The games that aim at delivering this | ||
must be challenging. Also, some mechanisms that will allow to compare | |||
scores will help. A winning condition is an absolute minimum. | scores will help. A winning condition is an absolute minimum. | ||
Additional challenges, like ironman mode can help here too. | Additional challenges, like ironman mode can help here too. | ||
= Finally = | |||
Those four won't cover everything the game might offer. There are educational | |||
games, that will teach something. There are construction games that will | |||
give the joy of creating. There are trading games, that will allow to | |||
exchange goods with friends. | |||
But those 4 elements seem to be the most common. | |||
[[Category:Gameplay]] | |||
Latest revision as of 12:12, 25 October 2010
by The Sheep
Four aspects of playing a computer game
There are four things we look for in the games we play. Every game will give us a mix of those four, a mix of unequal proportions.
Play as in playing chess or poker
The computer game may be viewed as 'game' in its common sense, with its strict rules, a board, tokens, etc. Sometimes it will require thinking, sometimes just luck (and sometimes good reflexes), but those can be very abstract. It's important to remember that every computer game is a game first. In order to play such a game, first of all you have to know and comprehend its rules. There may be hidden information or gambling, but still the player should have enough information to make decisions. The overall looks of the game isn't really important, as long as it's not interfering with the players view -- as long, as the board is visible, the tokens are distinguishable, and the cards aren't until they are face up.
Play as in playing dolls
This is so called role-playing. It's no longer a game -- it's a world, in which the players can operate using their characters as proxies. Many games skip this aspect entirely, but it's a strong part of roguelikes, so it would be unwise to leave it. What do you need for role-playing? Not much, really. A setting, a background story, some descriptions, some concept art, rules resembling those of the Real World. But there are things that stand in the way. Too much detail, to narrow path will kill the role-playing, break the suspension of disbelief. Look at the kid's dolls -- they are not realistic, even Barbie isn't. The important parts are exaggerated, everything else is left for user's imagination. The books tend to be more immersive than movies -- it's important to remember that.
Play as in watching a play
Ok, this metaphor is a little stretched. It should be rather like watching a movie. Yes, there's still some immersion, one might even make several decisions, but what one is most concerned about is just watching. One may watch because what he sees is beautifully drawn, nicely animated, perfectly calculated, but one might also watch because the story is entertaining, the characters are cute, the narration is atmospheric or one just wants to know what will happen next. Modern games go mostly in this direction, but there's not much place for it in a roguelike game. Yes, one can explore nicely-generated dungeon, be interested when he finds certain item for the first time, feel emotions when he completes certain quest for the first time. But that's it.
Play as in playing sports
A competition. The simple satisfaction of winning, or the more complicated triumph of being better than one's friends. The games that aim at delivering this must be challenging. Also, some mechanisms that will allow to compare scores will help. A winning condition is an absolute minimum. Additional challenges, like ironman mode can help here too.
Finally
Those four won't cover everything the game might offer. There are educational games, that will teach something. There are construction games that will give the joy of creating. There are trading games, that will allow to exchange goods with friends. But those 4 elements seem to be the most common.