Difference between revisions of "Talk:Development status"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think this page should be deleted and the indepth descriptions moved to the Category Development Status page. The descriptions can then be repeated on the individual category pages, and stuff like [[Stable games]] removed as a bad idea, as we'd rather have the auto-generating coolness of categories. --[[User:JeffLait|JeffLait]] 17:55, 29 Sep 2005 (CEST) | I think this page should be deleted and the indepth descriptions moved to the Category Development Status page. The descriptions can then be repeated on the individual category pages, and stuff like [[Stable games]] removed as a bad idea, as we'd rather have the auto-generating coolness of categories. --[[User:JeffLait|JeffLait]] 17:55, 29 Sep 2005 (CEST) | ||
:My reasoning for having categories and articles seperate is that categories serve as a navigational aid, and articles provide in-depth coverage. You wouldn't put the content in [[definition|Roguelikes]] into [[:Category:Roguelike games]], I think. While it should be alright to {include} the article on [[Stable games]] directly in [[:Category:Stable games]] (it's rather small), I don't think it's a good idea to use a category namespace page as an article namespace page. [[User:M|<b><i>[[User:M|–M]]<sup>[[User_talk:M|T]]</sup></i></b>]] 20:10, 29 Sep 2005 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:10, 29 September 2005
Why are there two copies of the same thing: Category Development status and this page? Why do we have stubs for Alpha projects that jump here, when they should be going to Category Alpha projects. How the heck do I delete pages so I can clean this up?
I think this page should be deleted and the indepth descriptions moved to the Category Development Status page. The descriptions can then be repeated on the individual category pages, and stuff like Stable games removed as a bad idea, as we'd rather have the auto-generating coolness of categories. --JeffLait 17:55, 29 Sep 2005 (CEST)
- My reasoning for having categories and articles seperate is that categories serve as a navigational aid, and articles provide in-depth coverage. You wouldn't put the content in Roguelikes into Category:Roguelike games, I think. While it should be alright to {include} the article on Stable games directly in Category:Stable games (it's rather small), I don't think it's a good idea to use a category namespace page as an article namespace page. [[User:M|–MT]] 20:10, 29 Sep 2005 (CEST)