Difference between revisions of "User talk:Duerig"
(Thanks, Nate879. No luck.) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
That is exactly my feelings now. I can find most of them after some googling and other searching around, but there are some that already seem lost. I'm putting them all here. If the admin doesn't like having them here, I'll host them on my own site at my own risk. Almost done taking a census of what articles are still findable. [[User:Duerig|Duerig]] 20:19, 1 May 2008 (CEST) | That is exactly my feelings now. I can find most of them after some googling and other searching around, but there are some that already seem lost. I'm putting them all here. If the admin doesn't like having them here, I'll host them on my own site at my own risk. Almost done taking a census of what articles are still findable. [[User:Duerig|Duerig]] 20:19, 1 May 2008 (CEST) | ||
I am the author of "Direct screen output" article. If you read it then you will notice that I am signed there. Back ago I also participated in moving articles from DungeonDweller to RogueBasin. My decision was to leave out this article on purpose. It was still useful back then but nowadays it is not just junk - it is actually harmful. It advocates coding only for DOS platform and doing it in a very unportable way. Sure, it beats many ways of screen output with great speed but now it is hardly important. There exist many libraries that handle the thing well enough and in portable manner. Thus, I refuse to give permission to copy it. Also I ask you to remove the article from archives. | |||
<b><i>[[User:Ancient|–Michal Bielinski]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ancient|Talk]]</sup></i></b> 20:41, 8 May 2008 (CEST) | |||
: Thanks for responding! I have removed the article as you requested. Moving these articles to the archive is about trying to make sure that we can actually make a decision about whether they are useful enough to keep. The alternative is letting them fade away, the good and the bad alike. [[User:Duerig|Duerig]] 02:59, 9 May 2008 (CEST) | |||
I assume you are aware of the names on this list who accented to move stuff (since mine was on it but you didnt have it at the time...) http://roguebasin.roguelikedevelopment.org/index.php?title=RGRD_Wiki_Project (plus it doesnt really come back if you search for it for people who agreed to have stuff moved... | |||
: I didn't know about it. I saw it when you pointed it on the link you posted on your own talk page. I need to go through the articles and remove the dups I accidentally added and move the articles by people who have already assented into the main wiki. [[User:Duerig|Duerig]] 08:53, 9 May 2008 (CEST) | |||
::Didn't know about it either, but thanks for taking the time for gathering all the articles together in one place again. [[User:Solarnus|Solarnus]] 16:08, 23 January 2009 (CET) | |||
== More lost articles == | |||
I found a page with more of the lost articles from roguelikedevelopment.org. It's at http://home.swipnet.se/dungeondweller/development/, It has most of the articles, but I'm not sure if it has the ones you're missing. [[User:Nate879|Nathan Stoddard]] 02:35, 1 February 2009 (CET) | |||
: Thanks for pointing this out. I looked through the articles but didn't find anything new. Let me know if you find any other promising leads. [[User:Duerig|Duerig]] 06:57, 2 July 2009 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 04:57, 2 July 2009
I'd rather see articles automatically included in this site requiring explicit removal. Some people dissappear off the net, if we cant track them down they cant agree to add their content.
I'd rather remove it when asked to than loose it forever... Stu 20:11, 1 May 2008 (CEST)
That is exactly my feelings now. I can find most of them after some googling and other searching around, but there are some that already seem lost. I'm putting them all here. If the admin doesn't like having them here, I'll host them on my own site at my own risk. Almost done taking a census of what articles are still findable. Duerig 20:19, 1 May 2008 (CEST)
I am the author of "Direct screen output" article. If you read it then you will notice that I am signed there. Back ago I also participated in moving articles from DungeonDweller to RogueBasin. My decision was to leave out this article on purpose. It was still useful back then but nowadays it is not just junk - it is actually harmful. It advocates coding only for DOS platform and doing it in a very unportable way. Sure, it beats many ways of screen output with great speed but now it is hardly important. There exist many libraries that handle the thing well enough and in portable manner. Thus, I refuse to give permission to copy it. Also I ask you to remove the article from archives. –Michal BielinskiTalk 20:41, 8 May 2008 (CEST)
- Thanks for responding! I have removed the article as you requested. Moving these articles to the archive is about trying to make sure that we can actually make a decision about whether they are useful enough to keep. The alternative is letting them fade away, the good and the bad alike. Duerig 02:59, 9 May 2008 (CEST)
I assume you are aware of the names on this list who accented to move stuff (since mine was on it but you didnt have it at the time...) http://roguebasin.roguelikedevelopment.org/index.php?title=RGRD_Wiki_Project (plus it doesnt really come back if you search for it for people who agreed to have stuff moved...
- I didn't know about it. I saw it when you pointed it on the link you posted on your own talk page. I need to go through the articles and remove the dups I accidentally added and move the articles by people who have already assented into the main wiki. Duerig 08:53, 9 May 2008 (CEST)
- Didn't know about it either, but thanks for taking the time for gathering all the articles together in one place again. Solarnus 16:08, 23 January 2009 (CET)
More lost articles
I found a page with more of the lost articles from roguelikedevelopment.org. It's at http://home.swipnet.se/dungeondweller/development/, It has most of the articles, but I'm not sure if it has the ones you're missing. Nathan Stoddard 02:35, 1 February 2009 (CET)
- Thanks for pointing this out. I looked through the articles but didn't find anything new. Let me know if you find any other promising leads. Duerig 06:57, 2 July 2009 (CEST)