Difference between revisions of "Talk:DND"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: Sole surviving website says DND. As the "primary" is now cybersquatted, I'm going to change the official page to the one that works -- [[User:Bessarion|Bessarion]] 12:29, 23 Mar 2009 (CDT) | : Sole surviving website says DND. As the "primary" is now cybersquatted, I'm going to change the official page to the one that works -- [[User:Bessarion|Bessarion]] 12:29, 23 Mar 2009 (CDT) | ||
:: I'd say drop the cybersquatted mirror. [[User:PaulBlay|PaulBlay]] | |||
Latest revision as of 17:56, 23 March 2009
I consider myself corrected, but the RGRD thread is mostly a heated debate/Flamewar about creativity in roguelikes (Not that that wouldn't make an interesting article...), even the (one and only) website is clear as mud. I'm reduced to reading the sourcecode to gain any understanding, and I swore I'd never read BASIC again... (And I'm pretty rusty)--D.M.B. 03:28, 28 Mar 2006 (CEST)
Is this DnD or DND ? The title and the use in the article differ.PaulBlay
- Sole surviving website says DND. As the "primary" is now cybersquatted, I'm going to change the official page to the one that works -- Bessarion 12:29, 23 Mar 2009 (CDT)
- I'd say drop the cybersquatted mirror. PaulBlay