Difference between revisions of "Talk:SporkHack"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(most intrinsics?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
These are six intrinsics out of twenty nine (see NetHack wiki). Calling that "most" is misleading at best. <b><i>[[User:Ancient|–Michal Bielinski]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ancient|Talk]]</sup></i></b> 09:52, 12 May 2009 (CEST) | These are six intrinsics out of twenty nine (see NetHack wiki). Calling that "most" is misleading at best. <b><i>[[User:Ancient|–Michal Bielinski]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ancient|Talk]]</sup></i></b> 09:52, 12 May 2009 (CEST) | ||
: The previous English "Few intrinsics are no longer binary and can range from 0% to 100%." was simply ungrammatical to the extent of not being able to tell what the original intention of the sentence was. In other words I had to guess, and I got it wrong. [[User:PaulBlay|PaulBlay]] | |||
Revision as of 08:08, 12 May 2009
From SporkHack changelog archive: The following intrinsics are no longer binary: Fire, Cold, Shock, Poison, Disintegration, and Sleep.
These are six intrinsics out of twenty nine (see NetHack wiki). Calling that "most" is misleading at best. –Michal BielinskiTalk 09:52, 12 May 2009 (CEST)
- The previous English "Few intrinsics are no longer binary and can range from 0% to 100%." was simply ungrammatical to the extent of not being able to tell what the original intention of the sentence was. In other words I had to guess, and I got it wrong. PaulBlay