Difference between revisions of "Talk:Developers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kisielewicz (talk | contribs) m |
m (Alphabetical order) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Alphabetical order == | |||
I made this alphabetical by first name because, with the use of various nick names, sorting by last name would be problematic at best. Having "Frost, Shock" on the list would seem a bit silly. | I made this alphabetical by first name because, with the use of various nick names, sorting by last name would be problematic at best. Having "Frost, Shock" on the list would seem a bit silly. | ||
I think TheSheep should be under "S" and the DevTeam under "D" --[[User:Kisielewicz|Kisielewicz]] 22:11, 26 May 2005 (CEST) | I think TheSheep should be under "S" and the DevTeam under "D" --[[User:Kisielewicz|Kisielewicz]] 22:11, 26 May 2005 (CEST) | ||
:Well, I really don't know what's best here. I, for sure, like looking for the last name better than for the first name, but this is only my liking. Nicknames throw things away anyway. | |||
:"TheSheep" being a complete nickname, it makes sense to list it under "T". At the same time, I'm sure many people would look for it under "S". Maybe we should explain at the beginning of the article how it was ordered. | |||
:Oh, and I don't want you to believe I'm twisting articles to my point of view. If what I did doesn't appeal to you, feel free to change it. :) — [[User:Poulpy|Poulpy]] 23:04, 26 May 2005 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 21:04, 26 May 2005
Alphabetical order
I made this alphabetical by first name because, with the use of various nick names, sorting by last name would be problematic at best. Having "Frost, Shock" on the list would seem a bit silly.
I think TheSheep should be under "S" and the DevTeam under "D" --Kisielewicz 22:11, 26 May 2005 (CEST)
- Well, I really don't know what's best here. I, for sure, like looking for the last name better than for the first name, but this is only my liking. Nicknames throw things away anyway.
- "TheSheep" being a complete nickname, it makes sense to list it under "T". At the same time, I'm sure many people would look for it under "S". Maybe we should explain at the beginning of the article how it was ordered.
- Oh, and I don't want you to believe I'm twisting articles to my point of view. If what I did doesn't appeal to you, feel free to change it. :) — Poulpy 23:04, 26 May 2005 (CEST)