Difference between revisions of "Talk:IRDC 2016-usa"

From RogueBasin
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with ""Harassment includes: offensive verbal comments related to ... technology choices..." So if someone says they use Windows 10 and someone says "Windows 10 sucks!" does this co...")
 
(A response.)
 
Line 3: Line 3:


So if someone says they use Windows 10 and someone says "Windows 10 sucks!" does this count as harassment?
So if someone says they use Windows 10 and someone says "Windows 10 sucks!" does this count as harassment?
> More like, "You are a terrible person because you use Windows 10 and you should throw your laptop into a fire" is unacceptable. "I don't like working in Windows 10 because the replaced Start menu is unintuitive for me and I'm uncomfortable with how easy it is to give Microsoft personal information" is perfectly reasonable. Your statement doesn't really contribute anything to discourse, but would slide unless it was part of an attack on a ''person''. Is the distinction clear? --[[User:Kawa-tan|Kawa-tan]] ([[User talk:Kawa-tan|talk]]) 03:44, 27 April 2016 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 01:44, 27 April 2016

"Harassment includes: offensive verbal comments related to ... technology choices..."

So if someone says they use Windows 10 and someone says "Windows 10 sucks!" does this count as harassment?

> More like, "You are a terrible person because you use Windows 10 and you should throw your laptop into a fire" is unacceptable. "I don't like working in Windows 10 because the replaced Start menu is unintuitive for me and I'm uncomfortable with how easy it is to give Microsoft personal information" is perfectly reasonable. Your statement doesn't really contribute anything to discourse, but would slide unless it was part of an attack on a person. Is the distinction clear? --Kawa-tan (talk) 03:44, 27 April 2016 (CEST)