Difference between revisions of "RogueBasin talk:Community Portal"
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Why is everyone so into removing things from RogueBasin? Why not just let it grow naturally to address the interests of those who send the time to edit it? [[User:John Shedletsky|John Shedletsky]] | Why is everyone so into removing things from RogueBasin? Why not just let it grow naturally to address the interests of those who send the time to edit it? [[User:John Shedletsky|John Shedletsky]] | ||
== Categories done wrong == | |||
I think the [[Categories]] page is done wrong. We have here roguelikes categorized by development state, alphabetically, by year, by theme, by evolutionary branch, and by special categories. All of these are useful, but the problem is that they are not correlated, i.e. not every roguelike appears in all lists it should. I think a much better solution would be a single table which lists all this information for each roguelike. (It should be possible to create a table somehow, right? Wikipedia has some tables.) I don't know much about wikis, but maybe it would be also possible to create a script that would e.g. sort the table according to one of properties. --[[User:R|R]] 19:47, 4 Sep 2005 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 17:47, 4 September 2005
More articles
There are a lot of RL dev articles at: http://roguelikedevelopment.org/
Perhaps we should email the original authors to get permission to replicate them here. If the above site were to disappear from the internet, all those articles would be lost. John Shedletsky
Place to discuss Rogue Basin
It would be nice to have a place where we could talk about this site, discuss what you be done, etc. Any suggestions how it could be named? - Poulpy 03:29, 22 May 2005 (CEST)
Perhaps we could name it 'The roguebasin forum'? :p
see http://peltkore.net/~szdev/boards --Slash 22:42, 25 Aug 2005 (CEST)
Wikipedia Merge
I strongly disagree with the idea of merging with Wikipedia. RogueBasin is much more than an encyclopedia. I suggest that this item gets removed from the TO-DO list --Copx 13:52, 13 Jul 2005 (CEST)
Not to mention that the WikiPedia folks would probably remove it, as we are not really an encyclopedia and not within the scope of WikiPedia's concerns (preserving human knowledge ect ect) John Shedletsky
Reviews removal
I think we should remove the reviews entirely. --JeffLait 21:39, 25 Aug 2005 (CEST)
Why is everyone so into removing things from RogueBasin? Why not just let it grow naturally to address the interests of those who send the time to edit it? John Shedletsky
Categories done wrong
I think the Categories page is done wrong. We have here roguelikes categorized by development state, alphabetically, by year, by theme, by evolutionary branch, and by special categories. All of these are useful, but the problem is that they are not correlated, i.e. not every roguelike appears in all lists it should. I think a much better solution would be a single table which lists all this information for each roguelike. (It should be possible to create a table somehow, right? Wikipedia has some tables.) I don't know much about wikis, but maybe it would be also possible to create a script that would e.g. sort the table according to one of properties. --R 19:47, 4 Sep 2005 (CEST)