Difference between revisions of "Talk:7DRL"
(reply) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: I suggest March 5–12 as the official challenge date for this year. That would give us a bit of time to get organised. —[[User:Thomas Larsen|Thomas Larsen]] 01:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | : I suggest March 5–12 as the official challenge date for this year. That would give us a bit of time to get organised. —[[User:Thomas Larsen|Thomas Larsen]] 01:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
: I checked on Google Groups and they have a new interface with much better spam filtering with the old one... looks like Mar 5-13 has been chosen already! [[User:Ekolis|Ed]] 13:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:52, 8 February 2011
Maybe some quote from Genesis could be used as a motto here. It is probably a bad idea to start with LOS and end with PC, but maybe it is a good idea to spend the seventh day on testing and generally having fun.
There is also 7HRL, which is a rogue-like game made in 7 hours or less. KING is one of them. Can you mention that? --Zzo38 04:48, 15 July 2008 (CEST)
It's already February, and no plans of a 7drl challenge for 2011? Or are we still using the newsgroup for planning? I haven't followed newsgroups lately; they're just so awkward to access these days! I know newsgroups are nice "for old times sake" since roguelikes are retro to begin with, but perhaps we could be a bit more flexible with the rules for announcements and planning of the challenge! Ed 14:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that the newgroups are pretty hard to use: many of them are plagued by incessant spam. This wiki is probably a better place to plan things like a 7DRL challenge.
- I suggest March 5–12 as the official challenge date for this year. That would give us a bit of time to get organised. —Thomas Larsen 01:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- I checked on Google Groups and they have a new interface with much better spam filtering with the old one... looks like Mar 5-13 has been chosen already! Ed 13:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)